Sub-titled:- They are getting away with MURDER
Item. An unarmed Brazilian Electrician is shot dead because he was assumed to be a) armed and b) a member of a failed terrorist cell.
The armed police who in fact shot him were harshly criticised on the grounds of ‘Health & Safety’. I bet the coppers really felt admonished!
Item A known gangster, Mark Duggan, is confronted by armed police and is shot dead; a gun was found in the car, but was wrapped in a sock.
Fifty-five senior policemen stood in a circle, all pointing to the left while shouting, “It was him who ordered the killing!”
Item, Latest. Anthony Grainger, a known criminal, was seated in a car with his friends. They were all unarmed. An unmarked police car stops, a single shot is fired and Grainger is dead.
NO policeman has been interviewed by the Independent Police Complaints Commission, and no-one has made any comment upon the rules which state:- An authorised and trained officer may open fire only when the threat to innocent life is ‘imminent and extreme’.
Question, Who is supposed to be supervising, either locally or nationally, the routine arming of police, and when such weaponry may be discharged. It is all very well for Inspector Gadget to support armed police, but with the carrying of deadly weaponry comes a great responsibility!