27 2 mins 8 yrs

I see that Gough Whitlam, Prime Minister of Australia from 1972 – 75, died earlier this week. He was famously sacked by the Governor-General, Sir John Kerr. The official reason was that the House of Representatives in Canberra, which Whitlam’s Labour Party did not control, refused to pass a budget. But like much official history this is probably poppycock.

Whitlam was deposed 24 hours before he was due to reveal in Parliament the existence of an extensive CIA network in Australia, ranging from a powerful listening station to a list of agents right through government. Sir John Kerr was a CIA man and he made sure that Whitlam was ousted. It ain’t just Slavs, Arabs and Central American peasants who will have their leaders chosen for them.

Now don’t get me wrong. Whitlam was a man of the Left. His one good act was to remove Australian troops from Vietnam, but this was more than outweighed by his many other follies, the worst of which being final burial of the White Australia policy. So on balance it was a Good Thing to get rid, but it’s always necessary to  get the record straight.

 

 

Click to rate this post!
[Total: 0 Average: 0]

27 thoughts on “FOR THE RECORD

  1. the White Australia policy

    There’s nothing racist about keeping the wogs and niggers out, eh Pete? Even when the country needs population growth and they have skills in demand. Anyway, it was in decline well before Whitlam:

    “End of the White Australia Policy[edit]

    Harold Holt. The Holt Government’s Migration Act 1966 effectively dismantled the White Australia Policy.
    In 1966, the Holt Liberal Government introduced the Migration Act, 1966, a watershed moment in immigration reform, it effectively dismantled the White Australia Policy and increased access to non-European migrants, including refugees fleeing the Vietnam War.[34] After a review of the European policy in March 1966, Immigration Minister Hubert Opperman announced applications for migration would be accepted from well-qualified people on the basis of their suitability as settlers, their ability to integrate readily and their possession of qualifications positively useful to Australia. At the same time, Harold Holt’s government decided a number of “temporary resident” non-Europeans, who were not required to leave Australia, could become permanent residents and citizens after five years (the same as for Europeans).

    As a result, annual non-European settler arrivals rose from 746 in 1966 to 2,696 in 1971, while annual part-European settler arrivals rose from 1,498 to 6,054.[25]

    The legal end of the White Australia policy is usually placed in the year 1973, when the Whitlam Labor government implemented a series of amendments preventing the enforcement of racial aspects of the immigration law.[25] These amendments:
    Legislated that all migrants, regardless of origin, be eligible to obtain citizenship after three years of permanent residence.
    Ratified all international agreements relating to immigration and race.
    Issued policy to totally disregard race as a factor in selecting migrants.

    The 1975 Racial Discrimination Act made the use of racial criteria for any official purpose illegal.

    It was not until the Fraser Liberal government’s review of immigration law in 1978 that all selection of prospective migrants based on country of origin was entirely removed from official policy.

    In 1981 the Minister for Immigration announced a Special Humanitarian Assistance Program (SHP) for Iranians to seek refuge in Australia and by 1988 some 2500 Bahá’ís and many more others had arrived in Australia through either SHP or Refugee Programs.[30] The last selective immigration policy, offering relocation assistance to British nationals, was finally removed in 1982.[35]

    Link here

  2. There’s nothing racist about keeping the wogs and niggers out, eh Pete?

    Yes, but so what? Racism not only doesn’t concern me, it’s a natural human self-defence mechanism.

    I suppose Australia has to deal with a growing islamic problem, but it least it wasn’t racist to let them in, eh?

    I know that the White Australia policy was in decline prior to Whitlam, that’s why I said he finally buried it.

  3. Do you seriously think that the White Australia policy should have been kept in place?
    How would the Australian economy have performed in today’s globalised world? Who would have mined all that coal and other mineral wealth? White coolies from Ireland?

  4. Yes Peter, I do think the policy should have been kept in place. But we can see that you prefer muslims to batter Australians on dark Sydney streets.

    Yes, white coolies from Ireland could have done that, as well as white coolies from Liverpool, Newcastle, London, Glasgow, Perth, Auckland and Cape Town.

    You seem to think that manual labour is wog work.

  5. Pete

    Your comment at 9.02 is outrageous and could just as easily have been written by Allan.

    Shame on you, I will not respond.

  6. Peter –

    You can’t respond because I’m plainly right.

    Not only do I regret that the White Australia policy was ended, I wish that a White Britain policy had been instituted also. You cannot say that I am wrong or unjustified and you know it.

  7. Yes Troll, I’m racist. I’m also sexist.

    So what? What’s the problem?

    Can one of you geniuses explain how a patriot, or someone who believes in liberty, could possibly object?

  8. //I regret that the White Australia policy was ended, I wish that a White Britain policy had been instituted also//

    Apart from the madness of such a policy, it would also be completely unworkable.

    Should the UK or Australia shut the door to people from Europe or the US?

  9. Noel Cunningham –

    Mass alien immigration has caused our liberties to be proscribed, crushed our culture, cost British tax-victims mega billions and caused uncountable numbers of crimes. Please explain how it’s “mad” to oppose and regret this.

    The three of you are full of fashionable assertions but haven’t explained one of them.

  10. //Please explain how it’s “mad” to oppose and regret this.//

    Well, it’s the same madness as opposing rain because it’s cold and wet on your head, and forgetting that it’s also necessary for crops and life and survival.

    Now, should the UK and Australia have shut the door to immigration from the US and Europe?
    A lot of people in those places are black.

    So should the UK and AUS have then said: well, let’s follow Pete Moore and let in only white French and Americans but not black?

    Not only would that be unworkable on a local level, but if you think the US or European governments would have gone along with that caper, you can think again.
    No governmnet would stand for its citizens being subjected to such blatant racial discrimination anywhere.

    Yours is just a vain fantasy.

  11. Noel Cunningham –

    It’s obviously workable. and a very mild form of it did so until the 60s.

    What’s obviously not workable or sustainable is turning Britain into a Third World shithole where immigrant crime is rampant and thousands of British girls can be sexually abused by muslims who are free from prosecution because the authorities are paralysed from fear of being labelled racist.

    News Flash: the British people did quite alright as a white society since the beginning of our history. It’s obviously workable.

  12. I’m racist too and I believe that Australia should have kept the ‘white Australia’ policy because it would keep Australia predominantly white – and what’s wrong with that?

  13. Maybe the Aboriginies should have kept an “Abo-only” policy in Australia in the 1780’s? On your logic they would have been well entitled to.

    But of course they were stone age wogs who got what they deserved. They are so much better off now, thanks to the racially superior whites. And as for those Jews, don’t get me started.

    I’m not being sarcastic, it’s clear that’s what Allan and Pete fervently believe. To be fair to them they are totally up-front about it.

  14. Peter –

    Yes, Allan and I believe that Australia and the UK should always remain overwhelmingly white. What’s wrong with that?

  15. Can one of you geniuses explain how a patriot, or someone who believes in liberty for some people, could possibly object?

    There, fixed that for you.

  16. Peter – Pete and I believe that the UK and Australia should remain predominantly white. What’s wrong with that?

  17. Italians here demonstrating in tens of thousands to keep Italy Italian i.e. white. What’s wrong with that?

  18. //It’s obviously workable. //

    No, it isn’t.

    So, Australia says: we welcome American visitors and immigrants, and then says American blacks have to stay away.

    Apart from AUS probably being kicked out of the United Nations, do you think the US would take that shit?

    It would immediately put a stop to all green cards for Aussies – regardless of skin colour – in the States, that would in turn lead to uproar among Australia’s young, and its scientific and business community, and your colour bar would collapse quicker than it was put up.

    You live in an age long gone; this is a multi-polar world, and no country can afford to opt out of what are considered universal standards of common decency.

  19. Pete and I believe that the UK and Australia should remain predominantly white. What’s wrong with that?

    What’s wrong with it is that the Aus element is in stark contradiction to your ‘deport them to their ancesteral homelands’ position.

  20. Apart from AUS probably being kicked out of the United Nations

    Noel

    These guys hate the UN. They don’t think it should exist. Get with the programme.

  21. What’s wrong with it is that the Aus element is in stark contradiction to your ‘deport them to their ancesteral homelands’ position.

    I maintain that position from my country which already had a civilisation created and maintained by my people who are white Europeans. White Europeans went to Australia and created white European civilisation there in a land where there was no settled civilisation and no people capable of creating one.

    And Noel really should demonstrate outside the Chinese Embassy against their refusal to allow themselves to be enriched by blacks and muslims. Then again, if the Chinese government had jews in power, the entire country would be overrun by blacks and muslims. It’s what jews do – wherever they go:

    http://www.theoccidentalobserver.net/2012/08/the-war-on-white-australia-a-case-study-in-the-culture-of-critique-part-3-of-5/

    While the Minister for Immigration in the Whitlam government (1972-1975), Al Grassby, is widely renowned in politically correct Australian circles as the “father of Australian multiculturalism,” the real architect of this poisonously anti-White ideology and policy in Australia was Walter Lippmann, a German-Jewish refugee who settled in Melbourne in 1938. Lippmann was a businessman and a prominent member of Melbourne’s Jewish community who by 1960 had become president of the Australian Jewish Welfare and Relief Society.

  22. I maintain that position from my country which already had a civilisation created and maintained by my people who are white Europeans. White Europeans went to Australia and created white European civilisation there in a land where there was no settled civilisation and no people capable of creating one

    That’s all well and good but surely those white Aussies would be deported to their European homelands if your position was policy?

    Or are there exceptions ?

Comments are closed.