118 1 min 4 yrs

Another day and more Jihad in the EU Caliphate….

Allahu Akhbar. Dead bodies on the street. Welcome to Belgium.

Note that the killer was supposidly “radicalised” in prison.  This is not in the least surprising. I am informed that here in the UK, in several prisons, radical Muslims run the wings and call the shots. They groom new inmates and gain their friendship, then their conversion to Islam. The shocking truth is that Prisons are fertile recruiting grounds for Jihad and nothing is being done to prevent this.

Click to rate this post!
[Total: 0 Average: 0]

118 thoughts on “LIEGE

  1. This is not in the least surprising. I am informed that here in the UK, in several prisons, radical Muslims run the wings and call the shots. They groom new inmates and gain their friendship, then their conversion to Islam. The shocking truth is that Prisons are fertile recruiting grounds for Jihad and nothing is being done to prevent this.

    As I said, Tommy Robinson doesn’t stand a hole in hell.

    As for the latest Jihadi, apparently he was well known to authorities, so why was he wandering about in mainland Europe?.

  2. Apparently he was well known to authorities, so why was he wandering about in mainland Europe?.

    I know nothing about the background of the attacker. If this is true it’s a legitimate question.

    As I said, Tommy Robinson doesn’t stand a hole in hell.

    23 hour lock up SSU I suspect.

  3. Hi David I posted yesterday about what is being done to address recruiting in prison.

  4. A bad family background. A druggie. Treated leniently by the prison system. Recruited by muslims who have no business in Europe.

    This is where Leftism all comes together, and the inevitable result is terror.

  5. Recruited by muslims who have no business in Europe.

    Some here have family business in importing these muslims. After that, who cares?

  6. Another day and another Putin critic meets a violent death. No doubt he shot himself in the back:

    “Russian journalist Arkady Babchenko has died after being shot near his home in Kiev, Ukrainian police say. Mr Babchenko, 41, was found bleeding at entrance to his block of flats by his wife and died in an ambulance.

    After writing about a crashed Russian military plane in 2016, Mr Babchenko said he received death threats and left his home country. He first moved to Prague and later to the Ukrainian capital. He was an outspoken critic of the Kremlin.”

    http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-europe-44296672

  7. It looks as though anybody who queries the greater-equality of muslims in the UK is being arrested. This looks ominous:

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?time_continue=131&v=30363QcHJ-o

    A woman who asked police why some muslims were being allowed to pray in London’s Hyde Park, (praying in London’s Royal Parks is illegal, regardless of the religion), finds herself under arrest at her home.

    What these utter filth did was that they knew that they had no right of entry to the woman’s house, so they got her to come to her door, then grabbed her and hauled her out then arrested her.

    Is this anything to do with having a muslim Home Secretary?

  8. If that film is authentic, you have an exceptionally grave problem

    I don’t know how it gets resolved, when your police and government are what can only be called enemies of the nation, enemies of all that is good there

  9. Peter,

    I share your views on Putin, but it seems reports of Babchenko’s death were, er, a tad premature!

  10. I’d invite all regular contributors to comment on what we see here.

    Obviously actors.

  11. I’d invite all regular contributors to comment on what we see here.

    I see the thin end of a wedge becoming thicker.

  12. Haven’t watched the video, but addressing the other issue 90% of the violent “muslims” in the US are Convict Converts.

  13. Obviously actors.

    I don’t think so. Here is the footage of the dispute at Hyde Park where the woman subjected to police attention at/in her home was explaining to the most dense of policemen why muslims should not have been allowed to impose their ideology on Hyde Park. When a muslim planks his prayer-mat on the ground, he’s claiming that ground.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0LZkgH9UXWs

    The police are confirmed as a cowardly disgrace.

    And from the link at 12.37am, one sees that it is this woman whom the police pull from inside her home in order to arrest her – for what?

  14. I’m amazed at so few comments here, and at the hardy har har winky wink comment by Paul

    If what we see is accurate, your police have attacked ( arrested ) what appears to be a law abiding woman who did no wrong at all.

    This looks like a police force that is oppressive by manner of government policy, not because some patrolman did a bad thing that was against policy.

    I ask again, do regular contributors have any sincere comment here? Does anyone think that the woman looked to be commuting a crime? Does anyone think that these police are acting in the name of justice?

    I get the strong impression that if we were sharing a jar at the pub I’d get more comment, on one of the more disturbing videos I’ve seen, something I never thought I’d see from the UK

  15. Phantom this is Modern day GB if you speak openly you are arrested, if you complain about the wrong people you are arrested.

    They have allowed themselves to be trapped in tyranny…. it’s an F*ing disgrace.

  16. Patrick

    What is seen on this video is hard for any free person to understand, and it should be impossible for any British person to tolerate

    I could understand this type of thing in Russia or Turkey, but in Britain?

  17. I’m amazed at so few comments here, and at the hardy har har winky wink comment by Paul

    I’m happy at that Phantom because your many flippant hardy har har winky wink comments on actors in videos were my inspiration.

    Look, I’m absolutely unconvinced that the woman in the first part of the original spliced video is the same woman as in the second part and judging by your ‘if that film is authentic’ and ‘if what we see is accurate’ comments you are also unconvinced.

    As to the complaint itself, maybe people aren’t that concerned with minor by laws being breached? The second video clearly shows a woman complaining that Muslims are praying and that collective acts of worship or other religious observances are not permitted in London Park grounds. In this case those praying could easily argue that it wasn’t a collective event. However, it’s not the first time that a Muslim type has been allowed religious observance, (note the collective qualification absence from the second clause), in a London Park:

    Now, the above of course is an argument based on legal technicalities but on the subject itself I’m completely unconvinced that the spliced first video is the same person and in the second, (what was all that ‘do you know what’s happening to Christians in the Middle East’ stuff? Is she really advocationg that the west become so intolerant as the very fundamentalism she seems to be complaining about?), this is how it’s done:

    https://www.whatdotheyknow.com/request/religious_activity_in_hyde_park

    https://www.met.police.uk/feedback/thanks-and-complaints/id-like-to-make-a-complaint/

    It took me all of less than a minute to find those links.

  18. Phantom this is Modern day GB if you speak openly you are arrested, if you complain about the wrong people you are arrested.

    Of course you are Pat:

  19. Reading the Davids twitter feed this morning, I think he’s interviewing the lady concerned today.
    I’m sure the story will become clearer then, but as I understand it, it’s the same lady but her arrest wasn’t connected with her actions in Hyde Park. She was arrested for ‘interfering with a witness’ in another case. (She was arrested for saying ‘it’s a gay day’ or words to that effect). I can’t find the links but I’m sure Allen will be able to as he’s found these other videos which paint a different picture.

  20. Wow!, Jude:

    A few years ago, courageous reporter Richard Peppiatt resigned from the Daily Star in protest at being asked to write lies about Muslims. “The lies of a newspaper in London can get a bloke’s head caved in down an alley in Bradford,” he wrote.

  21. Paul – as you won’t read from the link at 12.59am, the Park regulations state…..

    RELIGIOUS ACTIVITY IN THE ROYAL PARKS
    The Royal Parks (TRP) does not permit collective acts of worship or other religious observances in the TRP estate, either in their own right or as part of a demonstration, event or other activity. This includes spoken or sung communal prayersor other events that are primarily religious in focus.
    Exceptions are made for annual acts of remembrance at the regimental memorials in the Parks, which have taken place since the First World War.

    As for who would enforce the Regulation, the word ‘Royal’ indicates that there should be enforcement by the police. But this issue, whilst important, is much less important than a complainant being arrested outside her own house – but not inside as the police knew that they had no rights of entry without a warrant.

    Look, I’m absolutely unconvinced that the woman in the first part of the original spliced video is the same woman as in the second part and judging by your ‘if that film is authentic’ and ‘if what we see is accurate’ comments you are also unconvinced.

    OK – what if it’s not? The woman being arrested was removed from outside her home because police had no right of entry to her home – they had no warrant. What could the arrested woman have done that merited such behaviour by the police? Do you doubt that they were police? Has the BBC not confirmed this for you? This has happened before when a man in Scotland was held in jail over a weekend for tweeting at the time of a ‘Gay Pride’ march in Glasgow: “where’s a muslim truck-driver when you need one” – held without charges as a warning.

    Privacy in Your Own House: Who can enter your home?

    The police can enter your home (by force if required) if they have a search warrant. A warrant is a court document authorising the police, or other law enforcement officials, to carry out certain actions, such as the search of a property, seizure of documents or items, or to take samples. If they have no warrant and ask for your permission to enter your property, such permission must be given in writing for the search to be lawful.

  22. Paul – as you won’t read from the link at 12.59am, the Park regulations state…..

    Perhaps you didn’t read my 9.25? My ‘that collective acts of worship or other religious observances are not permitted in London Park grounds’ point is the3 direct wording of your link.

    As for who would enforce the Regulation, the word ‘Royal’ indicates that there should be enforcement by the police.

    No one’s saying anything about who should enforce anything so I’ll just let that straw man hang there.

    OK – what if it’s not?

    Indeed. As they say in Belfast, ‘if your granny had had balls she’d have been your granda.’

    Until there is proof that it’s the same individual in the spliced video no more needs to be said on the issue.

  23. but Paul you do understand the art of comedy is to take real situations and make them funny don’t you? Humor doesn’t work without truth init….

  24. That was good the perfect link to my comment.

    Indeed Pat. I thought it hilarious and it puts your claim in perfect perspective.

  25. But Paul you do understand the art of comedy is to take real situations and make them funny don’t you?

    Yep,

    ‘Are you telling me, thes days, if you say you’re English you’ll be arrested and thrown into prison etc etc?

    …… and he said no’

    Real situation alright.

  26. the free speech issue in GB is outrageous, and true people like Tommy, and Count Dunkula and this woman are exceptions. But they are exceptions that should never happen.

  27. Pat, as has been explained here numerous times, Robinson was arrested for breaching the conditions of a suspended sentence. Not because of some ‘free speech’ issue.

    It certainly hasn’t been established if that woman in the first part of the spliced video above is the same individual in the second part and / or if what she was arrested for has any connection with what was said in the first part.

    What Count Dunkula did was tasteless but certainly didn’t warrant a court case. Incidentally, I see that the Count, free speech champion that he is, is now arguing that ‘antifa’ be banned.

  28. and true people like Tommy, and Count Dunkula and this woman are exceptions.

    and true, people like Tommy, and Count Dunkula and this woman are exceptions.

    Punctuation is everything.

  29. Antifa is a violent organization which Attacks the law-abiding

    They don’t exactly hate this fact, it is their reason for being, They brag about it

    Of course they should be banned, And all violent attacks prosecuted

    I am sure that you agree

  30. The problem I have is that ‘antifa’ isn’t an organisation but rather an idea which is a loose collection of various groups and individuals, some violent some pacifist some ambivilant, that congregate as an anti establishment protest movement.

    Because ‘antifa’ is a non defined, non generic abstract concept if it, (as opposed to they), were to be banned pretty soon you’d have calls for anything rightworld disagrees with to be banned under the ‘antifa’ banner.

    I am sure that you agree

    No, as you can see from nuance above I wouldn’t.

  31. phantom just to be clear and its needs straightening out
    any dik on the left like Tommy Robinson who is jeopardising costly trials deserves to be held in contempt of court and whatever than means for his sentence, as you can see the judge in the first case was very lenient giving him a suspended sentence . we got it covered pal
    out justice system is 100% better than yours, where you have sentences of like 150 years and black people swelling jail for smoking a joint, you even have privatised prisons that run for profit by influencing local police to go out and target peeps fro dropping a ciggy butt
    please we don’t need any lectures from you on the court system in the UK its pretty robust and fair. Judges bend over backwards to accomodate loony tunes ..

  32. Speaking of the American court and justice sysyem:

    Kim Kardashian asks Trump to pardon Alice Marie Johnson

    The 63-year-old great-grandmother is currently serving a life sentence in prison for a nonviolent drug-related crime and was not eligible for parole.

    Johnson was convicted in 1996 on eight criminal counts related to a Memphis-based cocaine trafficking operation involving more than a dozen people. She was sentenced to life in prison in 1997. Today, she’s spent more than two decades behind bars.

    https://www.harpersbazaar.com/celebrity/latest/a20968667/who-is-alice-marie-johnson-kim-kardashian-prison-reform/

    A no parole life sentence for passing on coded messages because her gang of wolves prey on the weak one.

    I think I’ll stick with the reporting restrictions and contempt of court thanks.

  33. to deny that there is a problem with a lack of free speech in GB is pure bullshit. It flies in the face of events and prosecutions and fights and riots that are taking place on an almost daily basis.

    You are either being willfully ignorant or drunk on spanish wine.

    I follow this very closely and deal with it daily with some of the people this effects. I assure you, if you say the “wrong thing” people show up at your door, and other people threaten your life.

    To deny that there is a problem is ludacris.

  34. A drug case has nothing to do with free speech but I guess the oppressed must reach for justifications

  35. As a Human Being I was born with certain inalienable rights given to me by Natures God that no other man or organization can take away from me.

    You people have never understood this, even today it is a concept that is alien to you, it is what makes America both incomprehensible, and superior to you. It’s why we will always win.

    🙂

  36. patrick

    “The far right has always embraced the discourse of victimhood and persecution. Its cynical embrace of “free speech” is a dishonest ruse to propagate hatred, nothing more. If it managed to seize power, it would swiftly strip away the rights and freedoms of those it deemed treacherous opponents. Freedom of speech is precious indeed. Just don’t be deceived by a resurgent far right for which it is a rhetorical device to attack democracy, and nothing more.” OJ

  37. It appears that there are multiple problems with the free speech in the United Kingdom

  38. It appears that there are multiple problems with the free speech in the United Kingdom

  39. Bullshit Jude you don’t even grasp what the far right is….

    You’ve been sold on propaganda thinking fascist and nazi’s are far right, they are not they are leftists.

    “free speech” is a dishonest ruse to propagate hatred, nothing more.

    That remark right there proves you have absolutely no understanding of free speech….

    Yes free speech allows people to spew hate, but it is also the weapon you use to ridicule those that spew hate and garbage it is freedom it creates an environment where your ideas and what you say have to stand up to criticism.

    It is man at his purest form in the only competition that matters the battle of reason.

  40. Bull Mr>Roy the alt right ever only want the freedom to say cruel things about minorities and use the cover of free speech to cover their knobbly butts. We saw the uproar when we started to use the term gammon in response, Harri went bananas calling me a rascist.
    sorry mate you been exposed, don’t try the battle of reason ploy, the alt-right has no interest in reason, that would be described as fake news by its apostles, propaganda is all that you guys enjoy and live off, basically lies in other words,its your bread and butter dude. Be gone – “away wit ya and yer slabberin ” as we say back home!
    but have a great day too ..:)

    phantom limps along with empty phrases … oh dear ,

  41. Phantom,

    I’d invite all regular contributors to comment on what we see here.

    If this woman was arrested for opposing people praying in Hyde Park en-masse, then I would say her arrest is not just wrong but, f****** disgraceful.
    But I think I’ll wait till more information comes out about this.

  42. To deny that there is a problem with a lack of free speech in GB is pure bullshit. It flies in the face of events and prosecutions and fights and riots that are taking place on an almost daily basis.

    You are either being willfully ignorant or drunk on spanish wine.

    Who’s denying what? I merely pointed out that Robinson was imprisoned for breaking conditions of a previous conviction, we don’t even know if the person in the video is the same person let alone if the two parts are connected and that the free speech warrior Count Dunkula wants to ban an idea.

    No one’s ‘denying’ that in the UK and Ireland a judge can impose restrictions on reporting a court case where there’s a fear that that reporting could potentially effect the integrity of the trial process. You don’t have to like it or agree with it in the same way that I don’t like that in your teacher a teenager can quite legally acquire an AR15 semi automatic rifle and then use it to massacre other teenagers or that a grandmother can be given a life sentence with no parole for a realitively minor part in a drugs conspiricy while her co conspirators get lesser sentences.

    That’s all. No ‘denying’ anything.

    It flies in the face of events and prosecutions and fights and riots that are taking place on an almost daily basis.

    Even for someone who’s never been out of the US that’sa fantastically ridiculous claim Pat.

  43. * in the same way that I don’t like that in your country

    I don’t know where ‘teacher’ came from.

  44. //As a Human Being I was born with certain inalienable rights given to me by Natures God//

    “Natures God” must have been off sick the day this young woman was born

  45. Most people on here probably don’t realise it, but there’s a bit of a war going on in Hyde Park at the moment between Muslims and Christians.
    There’s a Christian preacher I’ve followed for years on YouTube, not because I’m religious, but because the preacher used to make some really strange and aggressive videos about atheists.
    He regularly goes down to Hyde Park to preach, and is uploading many videos of confrontations with Muslims also preaching in Hyde Park.
    Speakers Corner is being turned from a place for individuals to hold a serious discussion into a load of religious nutters having a rant.

    https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/home-news/its-speakers-corner-but-not-as-we-know-it-1346856.html

  46. Yeah, I came across that article when I was looking at the London Parks thing Dave.

    It’s a shame that a load of fundamental God botherers can riun such a long established tradition of discussion and argument for everyone else.

  47. I agree Paul. Decades of tradition, being trampled over by religious nutters.

  48. All men are created equal, except for those born in America who are superior according to Patrick. In addition to creating Patrick, for the record, Nature’s God also created the jackass, the mosquito, and Carrot Top.

  49. This is the same woman in the video who confronts muslims and is then arrested outside her door by police who are unwilling to protect English girls

  50. You’re correct it is the same woman in the video – thathas two completely unconnected events spliced together. The woman was arrested for seemingly assaulting a man in a car park and not for telling a cop what she thought of Muslims praying in Hyde Park.

    The video you speak of is a classic textbook case of fraudulent missrepresentation.

  51. Little old lady with assistance-needs assaults large man – says “have a gay day”, then is arrested in a manner in flagrant breach of any moral code that police may previously have had – no arrest warrant hence no right of entry to house, so had to lure her outside of her home. What was she arrested for? Was it the ‘gay’ one, or the muslim one?

  52. Paul McMahon, on May 31st, 2018 at 9:25 AM Said:

    Look, I’m absolutely unconvinced that the woman in the first part of the original spliced video is the same woman as in the second part

    Paul – your entire case, whatever it was, depended on you being “absolutely unconvinced” even though it clearly was the same woman. It’s difficult to persuade somebody of something when his entire case depends on NOT being persuaded of something, as one sees in this thread.

    Given that the woman is the same in both pieces of the footage and given the great protection provided by police to muslims for their activities such as praying in Royal Parks and preying on British girls, then it was perfectly reasonable short of absolute proof to consider that the woman was arrested for questioning muslims in breach of the regulations of a Royal park. But she was arrested in a questionable manner for something ridiculous for the police didn’t even have a warrant for her arrest and had to lure her out of her home.

  53. Allan — When Lee Rigby was killed you said it was staged, the work of actors. And you expect Paul or anyone here to take you seriously?

  54. Petr – I don’t care. All that matters is the strength of the evidence. That woman was clearly the same in both pieces of the spliced video, and I have no idea which pretext (muslims or gays) served as the basis for her arrest – but she was arrested for some ‘offence’.

  55. The point is, Allan, that people will not even click on a link you post because of your clownish record. People are discerning, their time is limited, they won’t click on something that is likely to be nuts.

    I hope for your sake that you were lying about the ‘actors’ at Woolwich because if you actually believed what you wrote you need to be taken away by the men in white coats.

  56. What was she arrested for? Was it the ‘gay’ one, or the muslim one?

    Ah, an attempted adaption of the ‘Trump didn’t know his co star was married’ and ‘that bloke that clocked Richard Spencer had a metal spanner up his sleeve’ trick. She was arrested for pushing someone in a car park, not for making remark about gays of complaining about Muslims.

    A@A, my ‘entire case’ was questioning the veracity of the spliced video. I was unconvinced that the woman in the two videos was the same. It now appears that the woman in the two videos is indeed the same woman but the videos are of two different completely unrelated incidents.

    The woman explains that the arrest happened a number of months ago and was a result of her assaulting someone by pushing them in a car park, why would someone want to splice the fotage of the arrest with footage of her complaing to police about Muslims? What possible impression could they be trying to create?

    The fact of the matter is that the video is fraudulent bullshit and anyone using it as ‘evidence’ that ‘people are being jailed in the UK for their thoughts and ideas’ are fraudulent bullshitters too.

  57. The woman explains that the arrest happened a number of months ago and was a result of her assaulting someone by pushing them in a car park

    I’m not going to listen to the 29 minute interview right now.

    Allan – is what Paul says above true?

    And if it is true, why didn’t you say it before Paul did and recant what you said about the police in this case?

  58. Each person is using their own spin Phantom. Listen to the interview when you have the time

  59. Each person is using their own spin Phantom

    Eh?

    From 7.26 the woman clearly explains how her ‘little episode in a car park a few months ago’ led to her pushing someone which led to her getting a letter to ask her to come to a police station to be interviewed which resulted in eventual arrest.

    Where’s the spin?

    She pushed some fella in a carpark and was arrested for it. I urge people to listen the full video and explain how her arest for assault has anything to do with the Hyde Park video.

    Why would anyone splice two completely unrelated events in a video to make them seem connected?

  60. Was the alleged ( an important word ) pushing in relation to the muslim thing?

    Even if it was, it would be highly wrong to splice video of two events and pass it off as related to a single incident

  61. I agree with most of what you are saying Paul…. but it’s still your interpretation.

    Phantom should make his own.

    and on any of the videos on the other site I know what’s in them because I am the producer/editor of every vid on the site.

  62. also that video has not been released to the public yet. Evan pulled it from the unlisted file, it still has further production that needs to be done to it……

  63. No, the ‘alleged’ pushing had absolutely nothing to do with the Muslim thing and happened ‘a few months ago’

    The interview above is an elongated whine of faux victimhood and the video itself is the very epitome of fake news.

  64. I agree with most of what you are saying Paul…. but it’s still your interpretation.

    So, no spin then?

  65. My only comment is that if looks like one of us bought a pig in a poke and that it he misled others here by doing so

    Allan, please speak up if you could.

    You need to be skeptical about all such videos, especially when the source is not known.

  66. Supreme court just ruled you can’t force a baker to make a cake for a gay wedding if they don’t want to.

  67. Splicing two entirely different incidents and passing them off as being part of the same incident is spin?

  68. correction

    Splicing two entirely different incidents and passing them off as being part of the same incident is OK?

    Calling this intentional misleading Fake News is spin?

  69. the vance video is an interview with the woman it doesn’t propose to be anything but an interview…..

    Now if that constitutes fake news than all interviews are fake news.

  70. Was the woman questioned about the one video and that it said or implied that two entirely separate incidents were the same incident?

  71. The vance video is an interview with the woman it doesn’t propose to be anything but an interview…..

    Now if that constitutes fake news than all interviews are fake news.

    Please read this and differentiate Pat:

    Paul McMahon, on June 4th, 2018 at 3:07 PM Said:

    No, the ‘alleged’ pushing had absolutely nothing to do with the Muslim thing and happened ‘a few months ago’

    The interview above is an elongated whine of faux victimhood and the video itself is the very epitome of fake news.

  72. ” Citizen Journalists ” whose work isn’t edited by anyone and who speak to an audience predisposed to believe all that they say

    What could go wrong?

    There is a reason why ” MSM ” have editors.

  73. once again the right committs acts of fundamental dishonesty
    mr robinson was imprisoned for breaking contempt laws
    this woman was arrested for some offense to do with assault
    spliced with a video of an related matter.
    Look its simple there two things going on
    One is making a political points the other is breaking the law
    as Jim Carey said in Liar Liar
    stop breaking the law
    and that’s something that Pat and DV support, we are against people breaking the law right?

  74. It is noted that these guys, who endlessly criticize the ” MSM ” have apparently introduced Fake News into this site, as they have with other fake news ( Puerto Rico truckers strike during hurricane aftermath )

    This is exceptionally bad form

    The MSM have often apologized for their errors, and have corrected the record.

    But the Alt-Right seemingly never corrects the record, never apologizes. Which does devastating damage to their own cause, the good and bad of it.

  75. i think it even worse that that, this is how fascism and nazism begins
    First they support the law, but then it becomes inconvenient to uphold those laws, because the real target which is gays gypsies jews muslims.
    So e.g Kristallnacht 1936 became a night of widespread destruction of Jewish property.
    Now presumably there were laws that made that illegal, but they wen’t upheld.
    Same here, what they ultimately want is a day of rage to go and burn mosques and destroy property.

  76. You are adding two and two and arriving at a sum of ten thousand.

    Let’s stick to the facts.

  77. Fool me once, shame on you.

    Fool me a thousand times, shame on me for listening to Allan.

    I highly recommend a retraction of this, both here and here

    A lady with the Twitter handle @realbasedamy made headlines when she broadcast live footage of a Police raid on her house. Her crime appeared to have been to offend muslims at Hyde Park and to wish someone “a gay day”. Many will wonder at the sort of brutal policing that Amy experienced and in this interview, we discuss what happened to her, why and what it all means. Please give it a watch and hear Amy explain what happened.

    The header on altnewsmedia.net appears to be very incorrect.

    For starters, this now does not appear to be ” brutal policing ” related to any speech issue.

  78. to support the claim of a police state you need to find an example of someone being arrested for that , clear cut, naked as the day .. not multiple example where it turns out the free speech warrior is actually breaking the law, or has ongoing matters with the police, such that that would prejudice the example .
    Double failure by allan and the host, better luck next time, we’re not all gullible fools, i am surprised they think they can get away with this in a n age of intense media available scrutiny.

  79. have apparently introduced Fake News into this site, as they have with other fake news ( Puerto Rico truckers strike during hurricane aftermath )

    except that wasn’t fake……

  80. at the moment we don’t have altnews we have cut n paste cowboys !
    still early days huh !

  81. Except that wasn’t fake……

    To suggest or imply that the police visit was a result of her comments about Muslims is absolutely fake.

  82. and it is the the LEFT the Socialists, the Progressives, the Democrats who are the NAZI’S…

    but you’re all to dumb to actually know historical fact.

    Obama turned the FBI into the KGB, he used the power of the Federal Government to persecute his political enemies and regular American Citizens.

    Arrests are coming.

    After the Dems lose the midterm the indictments will start. Mark my words.

  83. The Puerto Rico truckers yarn was 100% fake.

    The only evidence was an emotional report by an unidentified local policewoman, supposedly made to an NYC radio station, no details, no corroboration of anything.

  84. I don’t doubt that the vindictive Trump will push the DOJ to have political shown trial prosecutions against people that he doesn’t like.

    And that you will be proud of that perversion of justice.

  85. The burden of proof is on Patty and on the fake news Conservative Treehouse site

    They made the assertion, without any evidence.

  86. And Phantom you have produced no evidence to disprove it.

    Pat, ei incumbit probatio qui dicit, non qui nega – that’s how discussions work.

    I could declare the moon was mage of green cheese and even though you couldn’t disprove it it still wouldn’t be true.

    Paul I was referring to the Truckers

    I wasn’t.

  87. You want Hillary persecuted since you nuts have decided that she is the devil.

    That’s all it is.

  88. lol Pat you might as well have a video of you catching a baby alligator from your gator-boat and splicing it with a massive 25 footer with the caption
    Pat catches a whopper ..
    i’m sorry but i did this all as a teenager and never thought I’d seriously be having a discussion with a grown man about what constitutes fraud and deception that is bliningless obvious . Its a Fail fella an “F” grade.
    still early days eh?

  89. Phantom – let’s review the facts. The woman arrested in the video footage is the same woman who correctly disputed the right of muslims to pray in a Royal park in London and berated the police for allowing such a breach of Royal Park Regulations. Same woman asked a man who parked in a parking space allocated for disabled drivers to park elsewhere noting that woman herself has assistance-needs. The man was bearing down on her so she pushed him away and said “have a gay day”. Given what happened below, and add the muslim incident in Hyde Park, the cops decided that the woman in question needed some time in the cells. I was not aware of the ‘gay’ incident until having heard DV’s interview and it reinforces my opinion of the police.

    Facebook and other social media outlets are used as flypaper to mop up anybody whose opinions are ‘unacceptable’ to those in power who are destroying our society. An egregious example which the legacy media won’t report happened in Glasgow last October. Scottish Youtuber Goodfella was arrested and kept in cells for 3 nights for a tweet during “Gay Pride” : “Where’s a muslim in a truck when you need one?” Goodfella himself describes the events which would only happen in totalitarian states……

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZoTZ7loWyuQ&t=888s

    noneofusisalive1 week ago

    Remember the times, when it was a joke to say:”Oh, someone hurt your feeeeelings on social media? Call the Internet police!!”

    Just to be clear – people are being arrested for tweets, and for owning a pug dog, and for ‘revving one’s car in a racist manner’.

    There is a reason why ” MSM ” have editors

    And what could go wrong?

  90. So you agree that your video showed

    a) her confronting the police about their non enforcement of park rules

    b) her being arrested for something else entirely

    and that the video implied that it was the same incident

    So you introduced a misleading video here.

  91. Given what happened below, and add the muslim incident in Hyde Park, the cops decided that the woman in question needed some time in the cells

    That’s absolutely untrue. She explains that the cops came to the house after sending her a letter to come in and be interviewed about the assault.

    The fact of the matter is that the video is fraudulent bullshit and anyone using it as ‘evidence’ that ‘people are being jailed in the UK for their thoughts and ideas’ are fraudulent bullshitters too.

  92. I could declare the moon was mage of green cheese and even though you couldn’t disprove it it still wouldn’t be true.

    but I could disprove it…. we have the rocks.

  93. Trump has admitted to no crimes and has not been charged with any.

    Hillary has admitted to crimes and was investigated for them which high ranking FBI, DOJ, CIA, and NSA, administrators fixed evidence, covered up crimes, and lied under oath about.

    Clinton will never serve a day, but I guarantee that a shitload of those that committed crimes covering up hers will.

  94. Afraid not. You’d have to prove firstly that the rocks came from the moon and that just because they are alleged moon rocks how does it disprove that the moon isn’t made of green cheese.

    The burden of proof is on the accuser. As Phantom says:

    The burden of proof is on Patty and on the fake news Conservative Treehouse site

    They made the assertion, without any evidence

  95. Hillary has admitted to crimes

    No she most certainly has not.

    You need to pay attention to what words mean.

  96. Phantom, on June 4th, 2018 at 7:34 PM Said:
    Hillary has admitted to crimes

    No she most certainly has not.

    You need to pay attention to what words mean.

    Did she admit to setting up her own server…. YES

    Felony

    Did she admit to deleting 33,000 email that were under subpoena…. YES

    33,000 Felonies

    Next….

  97. Just because the Obama Administration broke the Law to not prosecute her it doesn’t change the admitted facts.

  98. Today we celebrate 500 days since Hillary wasn’t sworn in as President.

  99. Phantom, on June 4th, 2018 at 7:07 PM Said:

    So you agree that your video showed

    a) her confronting the police about their non enforcement of park rules

    b) her being arrested for something else entirely

    and that the video implied that it was the same incident

    So you introduced a misleading video here.

    The video showed the woman raising the issue of muslims, a police-protected species. Subsequently, and an interview with the woman is below, the woman was arrested for making a ‘homophobic’ remark – “have a gay day”, for gays are also a protected species. When they get together, things take a weird turn…..

    https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/e516cbeea9a49d730480aee7c9d65ed4aedd21ad4f6dfba262d7e0ca37cc8aba.jpg

    As for the idea of this woman with disability launching an assault on a male much bigger than her, it’s ridiculous. Here she is after her release – clearly not capable of assaulting anybody, apart from cucks of Irish heritage:

    The arrest was for a ‘homophobic’ remark and not for berating the police in Hyde Park. The police are bent…..

    https://www.google.co.uk/search?q=police+gay+pride+london&source=lnms&tbm=isch&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwiDmYvTgrvbAhWExxQKHaV9AboQ_AUICygC

  100. I’ve seen smaller persons shove larger people – and that’s technically a physical assault

    Cmon admit it This is not what you thought it was

    You are very naïve when it comes to things like this – You need to be highly skeptical of any such post or video from any unknown person, friend or foe

    It seems like she is 100% right in confronting the feckless metropolitan police in the park, Police who refuse to do their job, But it sure seems as though she produced a video meant to deceive

  101. The arrest was for a ‘homophobic’ remark and not for berating the police in Hyde Park. The police are bent…..

    *Sigh.

    Paul McMahon, on June 4th, 2018 at 1:08 PM Said:

    What was she arrested for? Was it the ‘gay’ one, or the muslim one?

    Ah, an attempted adaption of the ‘Trump didn’t know his co star was married’ and ‘that bloke that clocked Richard Spencer had a metal spanner up his sleeve’ trick. She was arrested for pushing someone in a car park, not for making remark about gays of complaining about Muslims.

    She was ultimately arrested for pushing a man. She admits it herself.

Comments are closed.